Unless you’re building clones, assume every house, like a human, is different. “The modern use of averages was pioneered by a Belgian mathematician and astronomer named Adolphe Quetelet.” starts the amazing architect podcast by 99% Invisible on the topic of averages. Host Roman Mars starts by saying “Throughout your education, you’ve been given standardized test and been graded by how well you performed compared to the average…building codes, insurance rates, Dow Jones all these are based on averages” and now you want to design a custom building to fit the average building code?
Is it good design practice to assume a unique house has an “average” energy consumption based on floor area? An “average” air leakage rate? Can we use tables to accurately predict energy consumption in buildings? Does the “average” become more variable with age? No, No and No!
The podcast delves into the notion of why designing to averages doesn’t work;
The high death rate in the Air Force was a mystery for many years, but… the military finally realized that the cockpit itself was to blame, that it didn’t actually fit most pilots… [A] young Harvard graduate named Gilbert S. Daniels… realized that none of the pilots he measured was average on all ten dimensions. Not a single one. When he looked at just three dimensions, less than five percent were average. Daniels realized that by designing something for an average pilot, it was literally designed to fit nobody.
Here’s the rub, the Ontario Building Code, most architects, designers and some engineers still use tables to figure components of a house out. A custom, high performance home, deserves a custom energy simulation and a bit of testing; after all, testing and tuning should be part of any high performance house, or car for that matter.
As Avery Trufelman chimes in “We know you’re not average, you’re really special.” And we agree, you are special and your custom home or building deserves a custom energy simulation and custom 3rd party physical testing to tune it an ensure the “high performance” part of the custom home is ready for occupancy. The cost of energy simulation and air tightness testing is so miniscule these days that it makes no sense to take chances for built infrastructure that may last a hundred years.
Is this your idea of comfort? Designed for the “average” person using tables? Is this the kind of comfort or performance you want from your new or renovated home? For the record, it’s 2016; we have tools for optimising efficiency, comfort and performance in the design stage and we can test in the building phase to ensure quality and performance.