Blog

Is Spray Foam an Air Barrier?

 

If you’re retrofitting vintage buildings without an air barrier and you’re counting on the spray foam as your air barrier; don’t. If you do, test your work BEFORE you cover it with drywall so you can seal the air leaks first, then drywall.

We had the pleasure of meeting a forward thinking design/build firm, Argyris & Clinkard Fine Homes. Their objective was to build thier client the most efficient home practical. Being a Deep Energy Retrofit an HRV was installed so the goal was to make the house as air tight as possible. 2LBS spray foam was sprayed in the stud “strapping” cavity and the studs were even spaced off the wall to reduce thermal bridging and ensure a monolithic uninterrupted coat of foam on the brick. Paul Clinkard and Liam Argyris  called us in to test the sprayed foam before the drywall went up. The results were an eye opener on why we can’t rely on foam alone for a good air seal in solid masonry home retrofits unless tested.

 

Background on Ideal Substrate

Foam sticks really well to clean wood or masonry when it’s dry and not frozen. It doesn’t stick well to dirt, oil or water. For the person spraying foam, it helps if they understand these application facts but they also need to know where to apply the spray foam and how the location CONTINUOUSLY moves as it passes from the basement to the rim joist to the roof.

The ideal substrate to spray foam onto is scrupulously clean, openly accessible and free of wires, cross bracing, 6mil poly, plumbing, cables, ducts etc, you get the picture. Ideally there would be NOTHING in the stud cavities and the foam could be uniformly applied producing a good air seal. Is this realistic? Absolutely not, stud cavities are busy places and spraying in them for a perfect air seal is REALLY HARD to do.

This is because, spray foam is shot from a 3′ distance, and like a flashlight shooting light, all the stuff in the stud cavity creates unfoamed ‘shadows’ on the back substrate we want the spray to hit first. Those shadows create voids or open blisters that can leak air. With each pass of foam, the substrate’s surface transfers it’s increasingly more distorted shape to the next, new layer. The situation can be improved by training electricians to run wires on the back of the wall. Do keep the plumbing on the warm side of the foam, though it might increase the quality of the foam-seal, pipes will freeze.

 

The Trouble with Spray Foam

The trouble with spray foam is that it has to be sprayed onto a surface – ideally the air barrier – and often we can’t chose the surface as the situation forces our hand. For the sake of discussion, let’s imagine we wanted to treat the painted drywall as our air barrier as in the Air Tight Drywall Approach. If that were the case, to bond the spray foam to the air barrier we’d have to spray the drywall from the backside which would be ideal, but impossible because the exterior sheathing or in the case of a retrofit, the exterior wall already exists. So we foam inside the house and adhere the spray to the back of our new wall assembly hoping it’s airtight.

The part about bonding the foam to the air barrier is to eliminate air movement between the two. The gap behind the drywall and the new foam’s face becomes the highway that connects all the small leaks from the foam’s imperfections and unfoamed penetrations and when pressure is applied, voila! As they say, for leakage to happen, you need only a difference in pressure and a hole. Because we can’t stop the physics of nature from producing pressure differences, we can seal holes.

To be effective, the spray foam should be sprayed onto an exterior air barrier like wood sheathing or if a renovation of an old house, coat the inside faces of the exterior walls with an air barrier as in this NY retrofit. By the way, if this new liquid applied membrane is the air barrier, it still needs to be air-tightness tested before the spray foam is applied. The purported advantage of this liquid applied, fibrous membrane may lie in it’s increased flexibility and stronger adhesion for better long-term performance. For any Deep Energy Retrofit, the air barrier needs to be tested be it spray foam, poly, liquid applied membrane, plywood, insulated sheathing, Tyvek, Typar or painted drywall.

In the aforementioned house, the foam sprayed on the back of the 1950′s block & brick was the leaky, high R-value insulation and had the drywall been installed over the air leaks, it would have played the role as Air barrier system with or without 6mil poly, faults and all.

 

So What Happened at the House?

The house, when depresurised to 50 Pascals, leaked its entire heated volume over 10.8 times per hour (known as the Air Changes per Hour at 50Pa or simply, ACH50) with an Equivalent Leakage Area (ELA) of 340 square inches. This is a massive level of air leakage and completely unacceptable and for reference, a tested EnergySTAR home should leak no more than 2 times its heated volume at that same pressure. We sprang into action with the builder identifying air leaks in the foam, they had the bulk foamer come back to touch up the leaks. On retest the air leakage was cut in half to 5.4 ACH50 with an ELA of 177 square inches a significant drop in heat loss, discomfort and condensation liabilities.

 

Comments Off

‘Historic’ Restoration

 

If your 100 year old house needs brick repair, take comfort in knowing that newer buildings – with OBC complaint drainage – have problems too. In particular a new building near our office in Kensington Market already needed lintel repairs. The irony was the name of the company doing the work on this new building, “Historic Restoration.”

 

 

Kensington Restoration

This 20 year old building on Baldwin St in Kensington Market, is already in need of repair. The brick in nearly every lintel was re-built, likely due to poor flashing detail.

Comments Off

The Bonus Room

 

As the price of land edges up, the practice of tucking a garage under the second floor of a house is common practice, but is it good practice? The bedroom above the garage has earned the moniker of “The Bonus Room” as it tends to be the most troublesome room in the house with the most comfort complaints from home owners.

 

The bonus room

Its common to tuck the double car garage into the face of the house making it the most prominent feature on the face. From an energy efficiency standpoint, this is a design flaw.

 

Extreme Heat loss

The Bonus Room doesn’t perform like the other rooms in the house. At best most rooms in a house have 2-3 walls that are exposed, possibly a ceiling. So at worst any given room in a house might have 4 exposed surfaces losing heat to the outdoors. Compare that to the Bonus Room which has an exposed floor and usually an extra wall and that brings the total number of exposed surfaces to 4 possibly 5 sides of the Bonus Room.

Bonus room close up

The missing scale in Smaug’s underbelly; 60′ of soon to be foamed 6″ ducts.

Taxed Delivery system

Adding insult to injury, the bonus room is taxes in so many other ways. Because of it’s greater exterior surface area, there are more drafts and sometimes the room is filled with a bank of not so great windows that face North. Making matters worse, the Bonus Room is typically furthest away from the furnace, which means the system delivering heat is challenged by distance (more friction due to bends & length), pressure loss through all the leaky joints and heat loss as the meandering path the ducts take through cold parts of the house. Essentially much of the volume and temperature pumped out by the furnace oozes out into the Bonus Room as a limpid and tepid.

Design Ducts for Cooling or Heating?

Respected residential code and building envelope expert John Harris of DSGI is a bit more hopeful of the Bonus Room with respect to comfort in saying “Room over garages are only an inherent design flaw in that it will be extremely difficult to get BOTH heat and cooling accomplished. Otherwise there is no reason they can’t be reasonably warm as long at the heat loss was done reasonably accurately, air leakage through the building envelope is controlled and the ducting is well designed and installed including duct sealing.” And therein lies the rub – can the same ductwork deliver comfort in both seasons?

 

P1000291

The Bonus Room with its underbelly filled with half pound open-cell spray foam.

But Foam’s the Silver Bullet…

When inspecting and testing a home’s insulation systems, there’s no silver bullet – including spray foam. Builders feel they can improve the design flaw by burying the duct-work with ½ pound, open cell spray foam. The problem is, we often still find air leaks in the floor cavity.

These air leaks in the floor cavity may be due to the fact that homes are all too commonly assembled with very wet wood. Spray foam doesn’t stick to wet cold substrates well and when the wood dries it shrinks across the grain often delaminating at the interface between foam and wood. There are also problems with spraying duct-work as the metal is often covered with a fine oil to repel rust, but just like a frying pan, oil prevents spray foam adhesion.

The Solution

Drake Landing

Drake Landing, a solar community in Okotok AB, built high performance homes that aren’t handicapped by a ‘Bonus Room’.

 

In Okotok Alberta, where they have plenty of oil, they’ve figured out how to get density and separate the garage from the house. Drake Landing is a Solar community that is forward looking in in its design. If Albertans can do it, so can Ontarians.

Bottom line, if the Bonus Room can’t be designed out of the plans, then put it on a separate controlled zone, make sure it’s really well air sealed by testing it with a blower door and try limiting glazing area. If you can’t do either size ducts optimized for cooling and stick a few baseboard heaters in the room.

 

Comments Off

Building Inspector Requires an HRV in Leaky House

 

A Toronto homeowner who recently had part of their 100 year old 3 story home renovated was stumped when the municipal building inspector ordered him to install a Heat Recovery Ventilator (HRV). Curious, we tested the home for air leakage and though twice as tight as the average semi-detached century home, it still came in at just over 7Air Changes per Hour at 50 Pascals. That’s leaky.

DSC_0357 (Medium)

If only it were so easy to distinguish houses that needed HRVs from those that didn’t. Only air tightness testing can determine if a house will benefit from an HRV instead of being penalised.

Translation; the house in question was too leaky to have an HRV installed and the Building Official was out of jurisdiction in requiring the home owner install the system. Installing an HRV is a significant cost and when installed in a leaky house is an energy penalty as the beneficial ventilation it adds for health is redundant. It’s like putting spoilers and an air scoop on a 1950’s beetle.

HRVs are de rigueur in all super efficient or air tight homes.

Bottom line, for retrofits, a building inspector should inform their decision on whether to install an HRV or not based on calculations resulting from a 3rd party air tightness test otherwise, the inspector’s just guessing.

Comments Off

Ventilating High Performance Homes

 

High performance buildings need to be air tight and have a heat recovery system – HRV or ERV – to efficiently ventilate, but to ratchet the performance up a notch, ditch the bath and kitchen range exhaust fans too. After all, every penetration in the building envelope means a leakier house. Air leakage is bad for durability, makes us uncomfortable and cost money. Hence the saying “Seal tight, ventilate right!

What the Good Doctor Says

To quote Dr. Joe Lstiburek in one of his latest missives, “With a single point exhaust you need about three times the flow rate compared to supply air ducted to a central air handler that distributes the air an provides mixing to get similar ventilation “effectiveness”… To get exhaust only ventilation to work minimally well you need to provide mixing and distribution with the house central air handler, and even then you don’t get to filter the air before you bring it in, you don’t get to pick where the air comes from and you certainly don’t get to precondition it.”

He goes on to say “Blowing is better than sucking. Sucking and blowing at the same time is better than blowing. And sucking and blowing at the same time with mixing is better still. When you add spot intermittent sucking at bathrooms and kitchens things are fabulous. If you then add energy recovery you are over the top. But if the only option is sucking over nothing, then suck. Sucking still sucks, but it is better than nothing. But remember you need to suck a lot and sucking a lot has its own problems.”

Rubber Hits the Road

Passive Home builder Ed Marion recently built a high performance home with an airleakage rate of 0.75ACH50 and he installed a fully ducted ERV in the house for ventilation. Given the low loads in this super efficient house, there was no conventional forced air system installed. So he installed a fully ducted ERV to distribute the fresh air throughout the house. Part of Mr. Marion’s strategy for getting a really air tight home was to eliminate as many envelope penetrations as possible. Cleverly, Marion used this as an opportunity to get greater value from his ERV by eliminating superfluous ventilation systems like bath exhaust fans and kitchen ranges. It meant that the home couldn’t have a gas range, but with the high tech induction cook tops, it really increases the performance of the house significantly.

Bath exhaust fans typically are over sized and the timer doesn’t stay on long enough for the wet walls of the shower and bath mat to dry, which is the goal of a bath fan; to throw out excess humidity. The other issue with sucking only ventilation means that outside air is being pulled through cracks in the building envelope. If exhaust ventilation only then stratification happens prolonging drying times whereas the supply or “blowing” mixes the air in the room promoting drying.

Fly in the Grill

The municipal inspector asked that a grease filter be installed on the ERV Intake and that the ventilation supply and return ducts be fireproof, which they were. The problem was there was no commercially available grease filter for that small an intake grill. In the end, some creative assembling took place and the client now has a grease filter.

All this to say that Mr. Marion clearly understands that to maximise the value of an ERV, we need to make the house as tight as possible and in so doing, provide the best fresh air distribution system that delivers a precise dose of fresh air for each occupant. It just makes sense and it can be done!

 

 

Comments Off

Testing A LEED Platinum Building

 

The Upper Thames River Conservation Authority just recently built the Watershed Conservation Centre (WCC) located in the Fanshawe Conservation Area outside of London Ontario.  The Watershed Conservation Building was designed by Randy Wilson Architect Inc. and is aiming for LEED Platinum label, a fitting goal for a building located in a conservation area. With its feature-rich efficiency details, the building is beautiful to see and to be in, so when Ryerson University’s Cassandra Kani-Sanchez requested our expertise to quantify the building’s air leakage, we were eager to oblige.

When designing a building’s mechanical system projected estimations on envelope air leakage and calculations on building shell efficiency are needed to size the perfect system. This mechanical system will keep the occupants healthy with a precise dose of fresh air and they will be comfortable with a more uniform temperature throughout the building.

Building shells are generally assembled to specification, however the air leakage rate in buildings is rarely confirmed by testing prior to occupancy. Given the simplicity and ease of testing, we’re always surprised that projects striving for high performance don’t confirm the air leakage rate to ensure they’ve at least made the target or beat it. Testing can also identify building envelope weaknesses that reduce the performance helping to reduce condensation or discomfort issues.

Kani-Sanchez, an engineering student working towards a MASc. with the guidance of Professor Russell Richman, Department of Architecture, have embarked on a very interesting study that will examine the actual energy performance of the high tech building by way of detailed energy modeling software. Without stealing Kani-Sanchez’s thunder, we’re pleased to report the building was air tight.

 

DSC_0482

The Watershed Conservation Building was designed by Randy Wilson Architect Inc. and is aiming to get labeled as a LEED Platinum.

 

DSC_0485

Standing in front of the air tightness testing apparatus, Dr. Russell Richman, Shervin Akhavi and Cassandra Kani-Sanchez pose in the entrance of the new UTRCA Watershed Conservation Building.

DSC_0494

The blue vertical panels are solar warm-air collectors that convert the sun’s rays into heat that’s distributed throughout the building when needed. The building was conditioned with a very quiet system – a heat recovery variable refrigerant flow mechanical system – using local fan coils instead of a centralized duct system moving large volumes of air noisily. See below for corresponding wall area.

IMG_1619

Photo 5: The blue vertical panels seen in Photo 4 above are solar warm-air collectors which are attached to the inside by the large white tubes through the wall plugged into the manifold on the ceiling of the photo above.

Comments Off

Can Vintage Brick be an Exterior Air Barrier?

We see it all the time in the old city cores; new additions attached onto the old existing solid masonry or double brick. New construction techniques often rely on flexible air barriers like Tyvek or Typar and it begs the question “What do we tie the exterior air barrier into when we transition from new to old?

P1050039

New addition on an old double brick house: After installing the CN Tower Antenna the crew will have to decide how to tie the air barrier from the new to the old existing structure.

New Construction

Typically – in new construction – the flexible air barrier will be strapped from the outside to create a drainage plane, ditto if they used insulated sheathing. This drainage plane will ensure that water isn’t held in the gap by capillary forces and can drain out of the wall assembly to allow the wall to dry. This is good.

New Construction detail: The flexible membrane embedded in a mortar joint will help drain the drainage gap.

New Construction detail: The flexible membrane embedded in a mortar joint will help drain the drainage gap. Note above that even in new construction, the mortar squeeze-out is significant and may block free passage in drainage plane.

Vintage Double Brick

Typically, the vintage load-bearing double brick with regular tie courses produced an air gap between the two wythes and this inner gap is usually partially filled with excess mortar squeezed out when the bricks were pressed together. A close examination of any masonry wall on any of the unexposed faces shows how inconsistent the mortar joints were. Voids very common in the rough work.

Double Brick Wall section

Typical example of a double brick wall showing the air/mortar gap between wythes of brick. Note on the inside the white parging in vertical strips ~16″o.c. Often, a parge coat was applied on the inside face between the wood strapping that held up the wood lath on which plaster was applied.

Beam Pockets: The joists inlet into the brick are only covered by one layer of brick on the outside. Notice how much mortar is missing in the joints.

Beam Pockets: Though this is an exterior face of a 1900 building, and the retrofit done in the 1950 (note “Corduroy” brick as bearing plates) the same applies to the inside where the joists inlet into the brick -ends fire cut – were only covered by one layer of brick on the outside. Notice how much mortar is missing in the joints, the same holds today on most hidden courses of brick.

Many confuse this gap as the modern equivalent to the drainage plane behind modern brick veneer. Unlike the modern non-load bearing brick veneer walls that have a drainage plane, the vintage walls have no intended drainage plane and have no through flashing to contain or drain water out of the wall assembly.

Double brick spalling

Getting it from both ends: The first course of brick on a foundation wall are subject to accelerated moisture damage either from wicking water from the foundation wall below or from rain water intrusion from the wall above. The brick faces are popping off (spalling) in the winter months

Because vintage solid masonry homes have no effective way of draining water out of the wall assemblies, it is critical that driving rain doesn’t get into the assembly in the first place and the best way to ensure that is by repointing mortar where necessary and by ensuring that all penetration (vents, windows, wires, doors) be sealed and flashed well to avoid gross water ingress. The other is to ensure that the foundation wall is waterproofed on the exterior (yes, the exterior) to prevent water from traveling up the wall by capillary action.

Brick is not an effective exterior air barrier

Brick is not an effective exterior air barrier either in new or vintage construction. BlueGreen Group has been doing research on these old buildings and the air leakage is significant and can range from 9 to 14 air changes per hour at 50 Pascals of depressurisation in the original state. Brick is too porous to be an effective air barrier and is difficult to seal against. So where do we tie the new into the vintage?  Ideally, the house wrap would be bonded continuously into the old air barrier – the lath and plaster – and at least offer a place for the future vintage retrofit to tie into the new if and when that renovation takes place.

P1050212

As the new gets woven onto the old, the additions on the front, back and top all require a continuous seal to the vintage structure.

Fiber vs Foam in Vintage Homes

Because brick is subject to such high air leakage, it will hamper the performance of fibrous insulations like cellulose and Roxul. To improve their performance, these fibrous insulations would ideally have an air barrier layer on the cold side to prevent wind from washing heat out. The alternative is to use 2LBS spray foam as it provides an all inclusive solution (air, vapour and inuslative layer all in one coat) and may be quicker to install that laying in an barrier against the brick.

An interesting take on installing an air barrier on the cold side was explored recently in an article in Fine Home Building called “Buttoned Up for a New Century” where author Jeremy R.M Shannon applies a liquid air barrier to the inside face of the brick. In this case they used an elastomeric Sto Guard product called Gold Coat. This allowed them to get extremely air tight performance – better than spray foam – and allowed them to use cellulose insulation which was more environmentally friendly than spray foam.

A product like this might be a great place to tie the exterior air barrier to from additions as long as the drainage planes are diverted outside the brick.

 

 

Comments Off

Checking Your Minneapolis Flow Sensor

I think the question I get asked the most is, well I dunno know, it happens a lot, enough that I would remark on it – a lot of people come up to me and they say “How do I know if my flow sensor is positioned within spec?

My answer’s always the same, I say: “Listen. Luckily we don’t have to go all the way back to the Civil War to answer this…” ¹

The truth is, most never check, but here’s a quick easy way to ensure your Minneapolis fan’s flow sensor’s positioned properly in the field. So easy in fact that you’ll do it every time!

The spec for a Model 3 fan is between 3/16″ (4.7mm) and 5/16″ (7.9mm). See page 58 and 59 of the Operation Manual.

Lay the fan flat so flow sensor hub is up. Using the fan frame’s cross bar, use a measuring tape, simply measure the gap!

 

P1050209

Easy as pie: slap your cross bar on the back face of the fan carcass so it spans the fan housing and measure the gap. I used my grandfather’s T-square for the picture above, but you can use your measuring tape!

P1050211

And the reading is 2/8″ AKA 4/16″ or 1/4″! We’re in the house!

If your fan is not in spec, the fix is super easy, you’ll have to loosen a bolt and move the motor in the mounting bracket till its within. You can learn more about it in this article I wrote a while back for Homer Energy magazine called Pimp My Blower Door: A blower door make-over.

 

Foot note:

¹ Sorry for the cheesy homage to Tom Waits.

Comments Off

10x Tighter than Passive House

Those crafty Alaskans. Its amazing what can be done when you have to pay so much more for building materials and energy cost. These factors spur’s on creativity and determination for people like Thosten Chlupp who have built Passive Homes in the merciless cold and sunless (winter) climate of Alaska. More recently, I read in Home Energy Magazine about another build in Dillingham Alaska by Tom Marsik and Kirstin Donaldson, who’ve built a house that’s 10x more air tight than the Passive House maximum of 0.6Air Changes per Hour at 50 Pa.That’s right, it clocked in at 0.05ACH50, a new world record!

This could be a submarine! Yes it’s true there are few windows and its small, but when its dark outside all winter-long, who needs windows! Making things really interesting… they plan to heat with an AIR-source heat pump, that’s right not a GROUND-source, an AIR-source! If they survive the winter, will this be the death-knell of Ground Source Heat Pumps (GSHP)?

Here’s a couple slides purloined from their on-line presentation with link:

 

Screen Shot 2013-09-28 at 7.58.41 AM

The tiny hole in the middle of the fan cover is what helps the flow sensor detect the minimal flow of air passing over it. I always felt smart pulling out my ‘C’ ring, but these guys used an ‘F’ ring!

Screen Shot 2013-09-28 at 8.00.14 AM

I can’t wait to get the data from this experiment! An AIR-source heat pump will be used to heat this Alaskan house. Please keep your fingers crossed – from December to February – for the couple!

Please click on the pictures above to go to the entire presentation.

 

Comments Off

Waterproofing Shared, Narrow Walk-way

Never say never, these homeowners waterproofed the narrow walk way between the two houses.

Never say never, these homeowners waterproofed the narrow walk way between the two houses.

 

A good job done. These home owners dug out the earth between these two century-old homes in Toronto in order to waterproof the walls of each home. Good on ya!

 

Comments Off